|
|
(Including Guidelines for Acquisitions in the One Journal Record Environment)
(Adopted by the CAC, August 21, 2003)
-
Starting on 8/21/03, and from this point forward,
WRLC libraries will combine print, electronic, and microform bibliographic
records into one record using the
print record and creating a holdings
record (MFHD) for each format/location that is held for that title: print,
microfilm, microfiche, and electronic. We will create multiple MFHDs
if more than one format or electronic version of the title is held.Each
library will set its own timetable for converting to one journal record.
It
is strongly recommended that each library retrospectively convert all multiple
format records to one record.
-
The 856 will go in the MFHD for the electronic version (where it may
still be found by the title finder). Each
library will decide whether or not to keep the 856 in the bib record.
If the 856 is kept in the bib record, it will remain there with a subfield
x ( |x ) so that it will not be found twice by the title finder and so
that the link will not display twice in the OPAC.
-
Each library will decide the order in which
to put the holdings records. In Voyager, the MFHDs currently display by
the alphabetical location name (that displays in the OPAC) that represents
your location code (in the 852 of the MFHD). So, currently micro format
MFHDs would appear before the print MFHDs. Therefore, libraries may prefer
to list holdings in the following order: electronic, print, and micro format.
To accomplish this, Voyager's alphabetizing may be "tricked" by putting
certain characters in front of the location name such as a hyphen. WRLC
will be able to help in this process.
-
Microform or electronic records will
only be used if that is the only format you have for a journal.
-
If only the microform or electronic is held
and a second format is acquired (no matter what format) WRLC libraries
will use the print record and will add the appropriate holdings.
Adding an 007 in the bibliographic record is now required to describe the
electronic or micro format version.NOTE:Multiple 007s can be created
by clicking on the 007 box, selecting another format, marking the appropriate
field, and saving. Once you have created more than one 007, you will see
that the 007 box now has a drop down menu, which shows the multiple 007s.
-
Exception: If more than one micro format is
held, use the best micro format record for combining records rather than
combining onto the print.
-
If your library is cataloging aggregators,
create separate MFHDs for each aggregator.
-
Do not add GMDs if the print record is used
for combining the various formats.
-
Using a 655 and 530 in the combined print
record is optional but not required.
-
Each library will decide to delete or suppress
the old electronic and micro format records that have been combined onto
the print record. If libraries delete the records and still want
to retain holdings in OCLC, a staff note may be added in the 852 of the
appropriate MFHD with a subfield "x" ( |x ). It is recommend that libraries
should delete the old records rather than suppress them. If you cannot
delete the bib record because of an attached PO, you may consider stripping
the record down and suppressing it, leaving only the 245 and the 260. You
may want to add a note to the bib or MFHD "now cataloged on the print record."
See examples below.

-
Based on each library's ILL practices, each
library will decide whether to put holdings in OCLC or not for formats
combined onto the print record. Since deleting the former electronic
and micro format records is recommended, libraries may want to put a note
in the corresponding MFHD w/ a subfield |x saying something like "holdings
for electronic/micro format still on OCLC record #xxxxxxxx." See the example
above.
-
Each library will decide on putting item records
in for the electronic format. If no item record exists, the "Number
of Items" on the item record will be blank and the status on in the item
record says "No information available." If an item record is created, the
"Number of Items" becomes "1", and the status becomes "Not Charged."
Since e-journals don't really qualify as a regular loan, non-circulating,
etc., use the "Electronic" item type.
-
Each library will decide on using a call number
or not to allow for browsing.Examples of call numbers are "Electronic Journal"
and "Electronic Resource." If a library decides to add these call
numbers, it may consider adding the owning library prefix in front of the
call numbers: "GW Electronic Journals" or "AU Electronic Journals."
-
Each library may consider using access notes
on separate 852s to put pertinent information about the e-journal where
others may use it: Simultaneous Users, E-reserves, Course Packs, classroom
logins, Subscription Began, Access Restrictions, Number of Users, Off Campus
Access, Interlibrary Loan, and Distance Ed.See Voyager and OPAC examples
below.
Guidelines for Acquisitions in the One Journal Record Environment
Because of the way Voyager permanently attaches POs to bib records, we must create all new
POs for electronic and micro format journal records that are attached to
the new print combo bib record.
-
Identify bib records with POs attached.
-
Relink the holdings of micro format and/or
electronic to the print combo bib record. You may consider shrinking
down the bib record for less confusion. See no. 10 above.
-
Create a new PO per your usual procedures
and append to the print combo bib record. Each library may consider using
the new Voyager created PO number or reusing the old PO number.
-
Link the new PO line item to the correct holdings
record based on format and/or location, transfer any relevant line item
notes from the old PO to the new PO, and approve the new PO.
-
Re-create the component pattern on the new
PO (noting what prediction pattern you used on the old PO). The old check-in
history cannot be transferred to the new PO, because the bib record is
different and the check-in history does not reside in the holdings record
unless you collapse the received issues. For this reason, it may be easier
to start the prediction with the piece in hand (since you are better aware
of its arrival date for prediction purposes) and manually transferring
the holdings in the old component to the proper MFHD in cataloging (since
the collapsing function in Acquisitions leaves much to be desired).
-
Cancel or complete the old PO (your preference).
You cannot cancel POs if there is a component attached; therefore, the
previous check-in history has to be moved somewhere (the new component
on the new PO or the new MFHD-see previous step) before canceling a PO.Also,
beware of completing POs.Once a PO is completed, it cannot be changed or
altered in any way and the previous history might get "stuck" displaying
in the OPAC forever if it is not transferred to the new PO or MFHD. The
old payment information is stuck with the old PO.Nothing can be changed
about that.
-
For POs that don't have a payment history,
you may consider deleting the old PO (after creating a new one that is
linked to the new print combo record) so that you can just delete the old
bib record to make things easier and cleaner.These types of things would
include any titles that come with something else-such as electronic that
comes free with print (which is paid for on the print record) or anything
that comes on a membership or package (which is paid for on the membership
or package PO, instead of the PO for the individual title.
WRLC Task Force Members
Linda Alexander (Gallaudet University)
Polly Khater (George Mason University)
Suzanne Picken (Washington Research Library Consortium)
Mykie Howard (George Washington University)
Mark Hemhauser (American University)
Betty Landesman (University of the District of Columbia)
|